Long-form write-ups from the partner sites running AURORA in clinical workflow. What changed, what didn't, what surprised them. We publish the cases that worked alongside the ones that didn't.
Studies are co-authored with the partner site. Pilot is rolling — new write-ups land monthly.
Photo + 3D scan triage cut CT exposure across the year-one cohort. The remaining CTs were the cases where the team genuinely needed the bone window.
Bringing molecular, histology and imaging into one signed report compressed the tumor-board lead time and surfaced two cases of subtype disagreement that changed treatment.
AURORA-SPINA produced family-ready decision packets the team could hand directly to parents. Comprehension scores improved; counselling time per family went up — by design.
Adult normal-pressure hydrocephalus is under-served by paediatric priors. Re-calibrating HYDRO-COMPDECIDE on the Charité cohort lifted responder identification meaningfully.
Patient-specific phantom printing changed the operative conversation. Aesthetic scores rose; theatre-time variance dropped; the lessons fed back into ENCEPH-FORGE.
Committing to school-age cognitive outcomes — not just head-shape metrics — reshaped CRANIO-NEURODEVELOPMENT and the protocol the rest of the module ships under.
Every AURORA case study is co-authored by the partner site and the module team. We do not write about a programme without it; we do not let a site write something we cannot defend. Three things end up in every study:
If a study would have a negative or null result, we publish it. The default is openness; opt-outs are reasoned and documented.