AURORA works with the individual who understands the investigation, selected by knowledge of the scientific operation rather than title, institutional prestige or enthusiasm for automation. Four groups meet that description in glioma research, each in a different way.
For each: what you bring, what AURORA provides, what you keep when the work is done, and what is deliberately not on offer.
You hold a glioma question and the observations to investigate it. AURORA turns the question into a specification the tooling can carry, without taking the question away from you.
No grants, no hosted data, no clinical output for an individual patient.
You want your work to outlive the project it was built for. AURORA publishes a contract worth conforming to, with the reference cases and evaluators that let a stranger check you did.
No proprietary SDK, no vendor lock-in, no central service you must route through.
Your observations do not leave your perimeter. AURORA runs inside it, speaks to the systems care already runs on, and is handed on as a specification with running code.
No data hosting, no data brokerage, no clinical decision support.
Glioma, written for the people living with it. Free to read, with no jargon left unexplained and nothing that diagnoses or triages.
Not a diagnosis, not a triage tool, not a substitute for the team treating you.
No onboarding, no platform account. The first artifact is a written specification you can disagree with; the last is a publication at exactly the scope the work has earned.
You state the comparison you want to make. It is recorded in your words and never reinterpreted for you.
Together we write the scientific task: target quantity, population, observational unit, pairing, baseline, permitted transforms, and what the output means.
One supported interaction, one genuine computation, one controlled revision. Recovery cases before more agents.
The contract, procedures, reference cases and components are published for exactly what they have been shown to do, and no more.